Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Ireland
# Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Ireland **G2i** · Ireland · `Remote` · `Contractor` 💼 **Уровень роли:** `Senior` 💰 **Компенсация:** `$100 – $200` 🕒 **Статус:** *Опубликовано: сегодня* · *Источник: Himalayas (JSON API)* --- ### Top Skills & Match 🎯 **Ключевой стек роли:** `[Senior-AI-Software-Engineer]` `[Senior-Software-AI-Engineer]` `[Senior-AI-Software-Developer]` `[Senior-AI-Engineer]` `[Senior-AI-Engineering]` `[Senior-AI-Developer]` `[Senior-Full-Stack-AI-Engineer]` `[Senior-Lead-AI-Engineer]` --- ### About the Role Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week Check out this Loom video for more details: We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer. What this role actually is You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on: • Whether the response makes sense - Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful - Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment - Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part. What you'll be doing - Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end - Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think - Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code - Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4) - Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading - Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code What we mean by "taste" We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like: - Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say? - Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct? - Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output? - Would this interaction build or erode trust? You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly. Who you are - Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience) - Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python - Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor - Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows - Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line - Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement - Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback - High bar for what good engineering looks like Nice to have - Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows - Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards Engagement details - Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location • Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible - Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well - Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat - Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview Originally posted on Himalayas
- Senior-AI-Software-Engineer
- Senior-Software-AI-Engineer
- Senior-AI-Software-Developer
- Senior-AI-Engineer
- Senior-AI-Engineering
- Senior-AI-Developer
- Senior-Full-Stack-AI-Engineer
- Senior-Lead-AI-Engineer
- Senior-AI-ML-Engineer-Code-Training-Data
- Lead-AI-Software-Engineer
Наблюдалась 2026-09-30, впервые 2026-09-30, найдена на 4 площадках, источник — Himalayas (JSON API).